It's easy to overthink things when you spend a lot of time on a bus. It's especially easy to overthink the philosophical challenges of travelling when you're spending a lot of time on a bus reading books with titles like "The Art of Travel" and "Fresh Air Fiend". But that's what I've been doing and I figure I might as well write about it.
I've been reading a lot of Paul Theroux lately, whom I admire as a traveller in the same way I admire Itzhak Perlman as a violinist. The idea of not just travelling, but travelling well, is on my mind these days because I feel compelled to make the most of my time abroad. I also keep thinking about how to respond to the requests I've gotten to let people know how I am doing and what I've been up to. To be honest, a lot of what I have to say is boring, and if it's not boring, it's....well, it sounds a little overdramatic. That's the problem with most people's accounts of their travels. They have these intense emotional experiences, and when then try to convey that experience, it just sounds a little overdramatic. The other half of the problem is that you experience lots of novel things when you travel and it's easy to substitute novelty for substance. It's kind of novel to have diarreah for a week, but it's not very interesting to read about. Good travellers and good travel writers make discoveries, and put those discoveries in a context in which they make meaning out them. So I'll do my best, at the very worst you'll at least get to hear what I've been up to.
From what I've seen so far, tourism is a big business in Vietnam, and the people have been friendly and helpful. It's a sharp contrast to northern India and an indication that Vietnam is following in the footsteps of it's friendly neighbor Thailand. I have mixed feelings about this trend. There are a lot of nice things about it. It's nice having a hassle free experience when booking a bus or train ticket, it's nice meeting other travellers at the cafes. On the other hand, it obscures what I think is the essence of travel. Travelling well implies elements of discovery and unpredictability. And travelling well usually involves an element of risk. The Japanese style of travelling is the antithesis of what I believe it means to travel well. The Japanese style of travelling typically involves a large bus, packed with families, which drives from sight A to sight B. Everyone gets off the bus, they all take the exact same photo of each person in front of sight B, and then get back on the bus. With organized tours, it's possible to have a similar sort of experience in an exotic place like southeast asia. And to be clear, I don't think that there is necessarily anything wrong with with a sight-seeing tour, because I certainly do it myself, but sight-seeing is not travelling well. Sight-seeing is completely predictable, lacking almost (but not completely) in discovery and involves almost no risk. The distinction is the difference between having a pleasant experience and having a deeply rewarding experience.
My own attitudes towards travelling have shifted over the years. As my passport nears capacity, I'm less and less surprised by what I find in other countries. I used to believe that looking at something exotic or navigating myself through a foreign land was enough to constitute the idea of travelling well. But travelling well requires understanding. This challenging and involves much more than just showing up to a new place and taking some snapshots. Understanding a place and its people is an indeterminate goal, which means the job of a traveller is never done.
I say all this because travelling well is what interests me. I'm on vacation, but vacationing (having fun) really isn't my goal. I usually struggle when people ask me how I choose my travel destinations. Of course I want to go to places that sound interesting and have something beautiful (or novel) to look at. But I think the answer that makes the most sense is that I choose places that I think will help me become a better traveller. People like Paul Theroux can make an adventure out of say, paddling a kayak from cape code to nantucket, but a less seasoned traveller needs a place that has lots of potential and at least moderate accessibility.
A few weeks before I left, I got into an argument with my good friend Nate about the value of taking pictures. Nate is in the middle of travelling himself and was stopping in Washington between Europe and Mexico. He expressed that his desire to take pictures was dwindling, and that the obsession of taking pictures detracts from the experience itself. I argued that looking for a good picture actually forces you appreciate your surroundings more. We went round and round on this and eventually conceded that we both had good points. I was pretty excited when I came across this very topic in my readings. John Ruskin was a 19th century British philosopher who advocated that every person learn how to draw. He didn't think that drawing well was important, only that you learn to pay attention to things. He believed drawing forced you to notice things, not just see them.
Yet Ruskin's enthusiasm diminished as he began to not eh devilish problem that photography created for the majority of its practioners. Rather than employing it as a supplement to active conscious seeing, they used the medium as as a substitute, paying less attention to the world than they had done previously, taking it on faith that photography automatically assured them possesion of it.
The camera blurs the distinction between looking and noticing, between seeing and possessing; it may give us the option of true knowledge, but it may also unwittingly make the effort of acquiring that knowledge seem superfluous.
It's a good explanation. I think everyone with a camera is guilty of this, but when people say that they don't take good pictures, I think it's because they're not looking enough. The mechanics of shutter speed and aperature are really the only concepts you need to understand 95% of all photography.
Well enough bable....Here's what I've got so far:
Ho Chi Minh City (aka Saigon) is actually pretty nice as far as 3rd world big cities go. It's loud, busy and crowded, but it doesn't have the suffocating smog of Bangkok and there are lots of great little cafes and restaurants. I spent my first day doing the obligatory city tour, which included some buddist temples, markets, and significant sites related to the American War (aka, the Vietnam War). The War Crimes Museum was a pretty sober look at the collateral damage caused by the war. It featured a lot of disturbing photos, many of which appeared in US publications, of farmers being executed, children on fire, and the contining deformaties caused by agent orange exposure. You come out of there really hoping that some greater good was served by our involvement in the conflict.

The Mekong Delta region is just south of Ho Chi Minh. The region produces most of the fruit and rice for the entire country, as well as for exporting. It is characterized by a labyrinth of tributaries, floating river markets and endless orchards. I ended up booking out a tour out of Ho Chi Minh with a company that, for an extra $5, offered one of the nights with a Vietnamese home-stay instead of a hotel. After one of the ferry crossings, I met my host who came to pick me up on his motorbike. With my backpack balanced between his legs, we drive out of the city to a rural settlement. As the road turned from pavement, to loose gravel, to puddled dirt, back to loose gravel, back to puddled dirt, I really amused myself with my own little sales pitch: Come enjoy the Mekong Delta! We have a nice air-conditioned hotel for you..... But wait.....If you act now.... for an extra $5 more, you can drive out to the middle of nowhere, have your bag dropped into a puddle of mud (it didn't happen, but I thought it might), and stay at the home of a complete stranger!

The home stay was nice, but unremarkable. My room was in an external building adjacent to the house, so it didn't turn out to be much a home-stay. My host offered to bring me a coke, which I accepted. What I got was a coconut with a straw. Dinner included a piece of braised meat, which my host said was opossum, I relunctantly tried a piece and found that it was a delicious piece of fish. 0 for 2 on communication.
Booking the tour provided an outlet for me to meet 3 Vietnamese girls, who had booked a day trip as a weekend activity. I immediately fell in love with one of them. They were all in their mid 20s and worked together for a textile company in Ho Chi Minh City. They worked on the business side of the compnay and were middle-upper class by my estimate. When I got back from the delta, I met up with my new interest and she took me out to the local markets for dinner. Then we headed to the night club Lush,which was, well, lush. Nice. The following evening we met with her other two friends for more local cuisine, which included pig stomach, chicken feet and duck tongue. They were all a ton of fun and very intelligent. Their company was opening a new factory this week. I jokingly offered to take pictures of the occasion. One immediately replied that they would tell their boss that I was from the Washington Post. I was quite impressed she new my hometown newspaper.
I spent a few afternoons wandering around the city and certainly saw a few interesting things. I came across a guy who was using a wire coat hanger to coax bees from their hive in a utility pole into a plastic bottle. The bees were to be drowned in wine and left to sit for 10 days before drinking. This is similar to the snake wine that is available where a cobra in put into a jar and filled with rice wine. After wandering around and getting lost in china town (how is it that every big city in the world has a china town?) I stumbled across a funeral procession. There appeared to be small band, which I can only liken to a marching band with brass instruments. It was a lot of noise and it hardly seemed respectful. Then a man with a small batton did a terribly improvised routine while vertically balancing his hat on the bridge of his nose. While I was standing there, an old woman came up to me, took my pulse, touched my forehead and then walked away.
It's always interesting to find out how American culture has pervaded throughout the world. My favorites so far:
1) A girl wearing a T-shirt with printed plain block letters, "Too young for Ashton".
2) A respectable art gallery with beautiful paintings, one stands out, the likeness of superman, but it's super-Bono, with U2 stamped on his chest. He says, "Buy a guitar, not a gun".
About 2 hours outside of Saigon are the Cu Chi tunnels, which were part of the tunnel network used by the Viet Cong during the war. It's one of those things that you hear about but don't give a lot to until you get there. The tunnels have been restored for tourism, and the various components of the villages are mock-ups, but it's enough to at least give you an idea of what it was like. I can't imagine fighting a war in that sweltering jungle. One section of the tunnels were enlarged by 40% to allow tourists to crawl through. You start by taking stairs to an underground room, which then has more stairs leading down to the tunnel, so you're approximately 12 feet below the surface. Then hunched over as far as you can, you waddle down the 75 ft stretch in either dim light or complete darkness. The few minutes it took me to get from one end to the other was enough to not wish tunnel existance on my worst enemy. The hot, musty air was really unpleasant. I was in complete disbelief that a group of people would have the fortitude to construct and spend extended periods of time in such a system. I really left with an appreciation for the Vietnamese soldier. When I mentioned some of this to one of the girls in Saigon she said, that's why our parents beat your parents. Ouch.